A DMU failure on June 5th found 25051 and coaching stock covering the 17.40 Liverpool - Newton-le-Willows and the 18.20 return.
During July 25051 was transferred to Crewe, this would be its last transfer.
The middle of July was a busy time for 25051, on 11th it worked the 15.45 Carlisle - Newcastle due to a DMU failure, four days later (15th) it worked the 07.25 Barrow - Euston as far as Lancaster, doubleheaded with 47447. The next day (16th) it worked the 16.45 Euston - Blackpool forward from Preston. And finally on 19th when 47319 failed at Chester on the 08.20 Newcastle - Llandudno Town 25051 was on had to take the train onto its destination.
On August 30th 25051 worked the 16.05 Leeds - Carlisle.
25051 was withdrawn during September.
The reason for the creation of this page is somewhat bizarre - creating new pages is usually prompted by the featured locomotive undergoing a significant event in its career, or the arrival of a photograph that just begs to have a wide audience. In this case it was a photograph that prompted the page, but it was of further interest when the photographer asked if the locomotive could be identified - the number was not visible in the photograph, the photographer having misplaced his notebooks that contained all the locomotive sightings.
The initial request was tabled until some free time could be found. Fortunately there were two things in our favour, the date of the photograph was known - April 27th 1981, and the photograph showed that the locomotive had hinged air filters meaning it was dual-braked.
The date was important because it was after both Derby Works & Glasgow Works had ceased classified repairs on the Class 25's. Thus details and paint jobs were very unlikely to change for the remainder of the Class 25's service lives, thus making photo comparisons much more certain. Additionally the differing styles in the way Derby & Glasgow outshopped their locomotives, plus individual differences - in particular the array of paraphenalia carried on the cab fronts would greatly assist in identification. The choice of locomotives that it could be was initially from a total of eighty seven locomotives, numbered 25026 - 25082 & 25218 - 25247.
Twenty four locomotives from this batch had already been withdrawn prior to the date of the photograph - these were 25026/029, 25030/031, 25040/043/045/046/047, 25052/053/055, 25061/063/065/068, 25070/074/077, 25222/223/225, 25232/238, reducing the number of possibilities to sixty three Class 25's.
The photograph showed the locomotive as having a boiler water tank - this would therefore exclude 25032 & 25242 - bringing the possibilities down to sixty one examples.
The hinged air filters clearly visible in the photograph indicate this is a dual braked Class 25 - this would eliminate the following locomotives: 25027, 25038/039, 25041/042, 25067, 25071/073/075, 25080/081, 25219, 25220/224 - reducing the number of possible examples to forty seven.
Derby Works and Glasgow Works differed in the painting styles when outshopping Class 25's - perhaps the most noticeable difference by Glasgow was the positioning of the locomotive number on the bodyside behind the cab doors. Derby in contrast always placed the number on the cabside beneath the drivers window. Additionally Glasgow began to use larger numbers which were carried by many of their Class 25's. Another Glasgow difference was the positioning of the blue star coupling code inboard of the buffers, Derby would always place them close to the cab corners. Some Glasgow locomotives were also outshopped where the skirt along the cab front above the buffer beam was not flush - there was a slight indentation where the cabs doors had once been.
Class 25's eliminated by all three of these differences were: 25229, 25231/234, thus leaving forty four possible examples.
Class 25's eliminated by the number and blue star coupling code positions were: 25028, 25034/035/037, 25044/049, 25050/059, 25062/064/066, 25072/076/078/079, 25082, 25226/227/228, 25230/233/235/237/239, 25240/241/244/246/247. This batch clearly identifies the former Scottish Region allocated examples that had received repairs at Glasgow, with these Class 25's eliminated fifteen possibilities remained.
25033 was also eliminated due to its number position, this left fourteen possible candidates and it is presumed that these had last been outshopped at Derby.
The cab front was next checked for detail differences - over the years the lamp brackets and other attachments found on this series of locomotives underwent change, particularly when the gangway doors were sheeted over. The locomotive in the photograph had two obvious distinguishing features - the majority of the brackets had been removed from the cab front and the electrification flash and the marker lights were in perfect vertical alignment. This was generally not the case particularly with the electrification flashes.
A careful study of the bracket positions on the remaining locomotives eliminated 25048, 25054/056/057/058, 25060, 25243. This reduced the number of possibilities to seven locomotives.
Several of the remaining locomotives had the electrification flashes in the wrong place, this eliminated 25036 & 25069, leaving just five candidates.
The alignment of the electrification flashes on 25236 was very similar to that of the locomotive in question but on close examination 25236 carried no paint date on the secondman's side of the cab front, the mystery Class 25 did have a paint date visible - four locomotives left.
Several of the locomotives left had obviously seen Royal Train service, they carried a small circular metal plate low down in the center of the cab front - this had been used for the two-way radio communication equipment carried on these Royal workings. 25221 & 25245 were eliminated because they were still fitted with the circular covers, leaving just two examples: 25051 & 25218.
Assuming all the above detail identifications are correct it is interesting to note that both 25051 and 25218 received classified intermediate repairs at Derby Works at the same time, in the spring of 1979. This would provide little help therefore in identifying differences affecting paint styles or other minor differences that varied over time. However 25218 received collision damage at Stonebridge Park, and surprisingly went to Swindon Works to have a replacement cab fitted. It was outshopped from here with a partial paintjob, to the replacement cab only. This is not noticeable in the view of the photograph at the head of the page because unfortunately it was the far cab that had been replaced - what a pity! From the photographic evidence accumulated the differences with the condition of the battery box handles and the style of the sandboxes carried by each locomotive suggest that the view is of 25051.
Unless of course you know different?
With thanks to Alan Baylis for the majority of the passenger workings.
Page added June 24th 2007
Last updated November 19th 2009
Return to Picture menu
Return to Home Page